From 921566dfcedbff831112d4c04542bd470d6a02f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Enes Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 02:07:48 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] update small typo it makes sense that "traits" is the correct word... :-) --- bindgen/codegen/mod.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bindgen/codegen/mod.rs b/bindgen/codegen/mod.rs index c6e3364234..2de56c19c5 100644 --- a/bindgen/codegen/mod.rs +++ b/bindgen/codegen/mod.rs @@ -4130,7 +4130,7 @@ where /// ### Fallible vs. Infallible Conversions to Rust Types /// /// When should one use this infallible `ToRustTyOrOpaque` trait versus the -/// fallible `TryTo{RustTy, Opaque, RustTyOrOpaque}` triats? All fallible trait +/// fallible `TryTo{RustTy, Opaque, RustTyOrOpaque}` traits? All fallible trait /// implementations that need to convert another thing into a Rust type or /// opaque blob in a nested manner should also use fallible trait methods and /// propagate failure up the stack. Only infallible functions and methods like