From 06d877034c970b98e65fa0a90e76c59f72920bd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick Walton <pcwalton@mimiga.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:28:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] RFC: Rename `StrBuf` to `String`

---
 active/0000-rename-strbuf.md | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 active/0000-rename-strbuf.md

diff --git a/active/0000-rename-strbuf.md b/active/0000-rename-strbuf.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f8e43ebae57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/active/0000-rename-strbuf.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+- Start Date: 2014-04-30
+- RFC PR #: (leave this empty)
+- Rust Issue #: (leave this empty)
+
+# Summary
+
+`StrBuf` should be renamed to `String`.
+
+# Motivation
+
+Since `StrBuf` is so common, it would benefit from a more traditional name.
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+It may be that `StrBuf` is a better name because it mirrors Java `StringBuilder` or C# `StringBuffer`. It may also be that `String` is confusing because of its similarity to `&str`.
+
+# Detailed design
+
+Rename `StrBuf` to `String`.
+
+# Alternatives
+
+The impact of not doing this would be that `StrBuf` would remain `StrBuf`.
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+None.
\ No newline at end of file