-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Question]: Information on Agents #16600
Comments
I wasn't able to find specific information comparing LlamaIndex and LangGraph for agents in the repository. However, LlamaIndex offers a comprehensive framework for building agentic systems with features like breaking down complex questions, choosing external tools, planning and executing tasks, and storing completed tasks in a memory module. It supports various use cases, provides prebuilt agent architectures, and allows for custom workflows. Additionally, LlamaIndex can be integrated as a tool within other agent frameworks, enhancing its versatility [1][2]. |
@dosu not clear in specific to langgraph |
@sreenivasanm6 any agentic implementation in llama-index should probably be using workflows While we do have prebuilts like FunctionCallingAgent to get started quickly, in most cases I see, users need so much customization that it makes sense to build more from-scratch with workflows I can say that in my own observations/notes
The feedback on workflows has been positive from basically everyone who's tried it. I would say that the only negative that comes to mind is that not every developer is familiar with async+python |
Thanks for the info. |
Question Validation
Question
Why should one prefer llama index for agents when compared to langgraph? Please help in providing detail.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: