Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should roocs provide "warnings" as well as "fixes"? #76

Open
agstephens opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Should roocs provide "warnings" as well as "fixes"? #76

agstephens opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@agstephens
Copy link
Contributor

At present we use the "character" to provide "fixes".

In some cases, there will be issues about certain data sets that cannot be fixed - but will be useful for users to know about.

Examples:

  1. A model that has not provided the same time range as others for a given experiment. There is no fix, but if users know it they can modify their approach to exclude the model or modify the time range they are using.

  2. All data for an experiment uses a virtual time range (e.g. control runs). In such cases the actual time is irrelevant - so different models start at different years. This could be provided in "warnings" - so the user can approach the data accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant