Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider moving use-lodash-es to its own repository. #2243

Closed
wtgtybhertgeghgtwtg opened this issue Feb 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider moving use-lodash-es to its own repository. #2243

wtgtybhertgeghgtwtg opened this issue Feb 14, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@wtgtybhertgeghgtwtg
Copy link

Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Feature. Or organizational request, I guess.
(If this is a usage question, please do not post it here—post it on Stack Overflow instead. If this is not a “feature” or a “bug”, or the phrase “How do I...?” applies, then it's probably a usage question.)

What is the current behavior?
.babelrc uses the script use-lodash-es as a plugin.

If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem via https://jsfiddle.net or similar.

What is the expected behavior?
.babelrc uses a package called babel-plugin-use-lodash-es (or something to that effect) as a plugin.

Which versions of Redux, and which browser and OS are affected by this issue? Did this work in previous versions of Redux?
None, this is an internal issue.

The main reason I suggest this is so that packages that have redux as a peerDependency can use the same type of lodash for the environment without having to copy/paste use-lodash-es.

@timdorr
Copy link
Member

timdorr commented Feb 14, 2017

Feel free to copy it out and set up a project for it. No one here is going to stop you. It's basically a very advanced sed script 😄

@wtgtybhertgeghgtwtg
Copy link
Author

It took five months, but it's done. It's all yours, if you want it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants