-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FormSlotsValidatorAction added #288
Conversation
Will update https://rasa.com/docs/rasa/forms#validating-form-input once we merge this one :) |
I'll try to squeeze in the review between retro and tech onboarding .Do you already have a matching docs PR on Rasa Open Source side? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice testing 🥇 Left a couple of comments 🙈
changelog/288.improvement.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
Add the `FormSlotsValidatorAction` abstract class that can be used | |||
to validate slots which were extracted by a Form. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's also add a usage example :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant actually here in the changelog. I think users are more likely to look into the changelog then the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks great
changelog/288.improvement.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
Add the `FormSlotsValidatorAction` abstract class that can be used | |||
to validate slots which were extracted by a Form. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant actually here in the changelog. I think users are more likely to look into the changelog then the codebase.
I made it work the way it worked before (in the current implementation events get updated in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made it work the way it worked before (in the current implementation events get updated in slots dictionary) but I still have no idea if it's the right behavior or not because there is nothing about it in the description.
Looks great 🥇 Just a few comments, then we're ready to go. Where would you expect a description?
@alwx I thought about whether the |
@wochinge done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
ea20b3a
to
02e30bd
Compare
Proposed changes:
Status (please check what you already did):
black
(please check Readme for instructions)