Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to use v1.12.0 on Github Enterprise #292

Closed
zerola opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #293
Closed

Unable to use v1.12.0 on Github Enterprise #292

zerola opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #293
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@zerola
Copy link

zerola commented Nov 6, 2024

Hi, version v1.12.0 is unable to work on Github Enterprise.

error

I believe the checkout step which tries to checkout the action itself is cloning it from the local Github Enterprise server, where the action doesn't exist (instead of public GitHub): https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/blob/release/v1/action.yml#L138

@webknjaz webknjaz added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 6, 2024
@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Nov 6, 2024

Thanks for the report!

cc @br3ndonland

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Nov 6, 2024

@zerola please try pinning to pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@unstable/v1 or pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@0a87186d5f9e2303ed3c19e0fdd59abe52a28bb7 and report back. These contain the fix from #293 that I haven't yet tagged.

@zerola
Copy link
Author

zerola commented Nov 6, 2024

@webknjaz I confirm the pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@unstable/v1 works within Github Enterprise. Thank you!

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Nov 6, 2024

Great, thanks for verifying!

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Nov 6, 2024

The fix is now released as a part of v1.12.1: #296.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants