-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Eturnal not starting on Rocky Linux 8.5 #19
Comments
The Erlang VM starts up a small helper daemon called epmd, which keeps track of the running Erlang/OTP applications (I'm hoping to get rid of this in the future, BTW). What you describe sounds like some eturnal process got hard-killed and wasn't able to deregister itself from epmd, and for some reason the epmd process itself has not been killed (which would usually happen if eturnal was started and stopped via systemd). Do you get any output from |
Thanks for the quick reply and side information. I did kill the process, but relaunching brings the same issue:
|
Thanks. I guess killing the hanging It seems epmd is started. The next step would be the eturnal process telling epmd "hey, my name is
|
I will see if I find time to test tonight! Thank you. |
Nevermind, I've installed Rocky in VirtualBox and was able to reproduce the problem. It's a glibc compatibility issue, |
Okay, thanks for the feedback. |
Thanks for reporting the issue! Should be fixed, now. Just in case you're interested, I've published packages which don't depend on libnsl on https://eturnal.net/tmp/. |
Thanks. Used it and works also without libnsl being installed on the machine. |
Dear Holger,
discovered an issue with Rocky Linux 8.5 (CentOS 8). It is basically a fresh install.
I installed eturnal both ways with dnf package manager or binary packages without any errors or unforeseeable things with the following result:
The command above stucks forever, so I killed it...
I previously had CentOS 7 and it runs smoothly without any distortions ( I only used binary install, however).
Here are the outputs from log-files (erlang.log.1) which shows a similar issue as if I would use "eturnalctl foreground":
I am unable to investigate further at least "this year" xD ... What makes me wonder is that eturnal is being used already by another Erlang node.. I could not discover any process belonging to eturnal which could block.
Thanks and wishing a great evening!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: