Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate required functions #10

Open
graybeal opened this issue Nov 20, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Evaluate required functions #10

graybeal opened this issue Nov 20, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@graybeal
Copy link
Contributor

Review user scenarios at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxU2IN56fUoASxaiEOsn2NDtjRGWw5rK_BxRAKcyvwU/edit, evaluate for applicability to current hackathon. Consider how to address in UI (#9).

@graybeal
Copy link
Contributor Author

I created the pull requests #11 and #12 to include my breakdown of the functions that are required for your use cases. We'll mostly get to the first category of functions in that list:
*** Understanding Prefixes
prefix available or taken
most credible target for prefix
in which registry/ies
Documentation: For given registry's entry for this prefix:

  • Primary prefix
  • Alternate prefix
  • Entity identifier (e.g., IRI)
  • Identifier namespace path if different (e.g., includes # or / separator)
    • identifier resolution - computable (y/n)
    • identifier resolution - human viewable (y/n)
  • different namespace for human readable pages
  • homepage
  • description
  • title
  • more detailed metadata about the entry
    • Local identifier (e.g., DB record key)
    • who registered
    • when registered

Then the second category we might be able to show, if we can come up with some decent tests.

*** Understanding Prefixes: Errors
prefix clashes - one prefix, multiple resources
prefix ambiguity - one prefix, maybe multiple resources
redundant primary prefixes per resource - more than one prefix

I may add some analysis of how we might present this info most cleanly, per #9.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant