Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bacteria] Streptococcus agalactiae CC 17 #843

Closed
4 tasks done
jeanrjc opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

[Bacteria] Streptococcus agalactiae CC 17 #843

jeanrjc opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Species Issues relating to species data in the catalog

Comments

@jeanrjc
Copy link
Contributor

jeanrjc commented Apr 8, 2021

Question : Should I add this clone as if I were adding a species, or should I proceed differently ?

  • Name: Streptococcus agalactiae CC 17
  • Common name: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Clonal Complex 17

Description: Virulent strain responsible for most of GBS late onset infection in neonates.

Demographic information:

  • generation time in years : 365 generations per year (1 per day).
    No estimation was done for S agalactiae, but we can use estimates from E coli, which ranges from around 0.5 to 20 generations per day. The standard generation time used is 1.
    • ref for lower range estimates : Michael A. Savageau, « Escherichia coli habitats, cell types, and molecular mechanisms of gene control », The american naturalist 122, nᵒ 6 (1983): 732–744.
    • ref for higher range estimates : Mohamed Ghalayini et al., « Evolution of a Dominant Natural Isolate of Escherichia Coli in the Human Gut over the Course of a Year Suggests a Neutral Evolution with Reduced Effective Population Size », Applied and Environmental Microbiology 84, nᵒ 6 (5 janvier 2018): e02377-17, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02377-17.
  • "default" population size : Estimated with estimates of the mutation rate through the Watterson estimator: Ne = 140k
    Ranges depending on the range of mutation rate estimates : ~[80k; 3M]
    ref for estimation of mutation rate: Da Cunha et al. "Streptococcus agalactiae clones infecting humans were selected and fixed through the extensive use of tetracycline", 2014, Nat. Comm., 10.1038/ncomms5544

Chromosome structure:

Note: The assembly should be chromosome-level, i.e., not composed of thousands of scaffolds.

Recombination rates:

In Bacteria, recombination rate is the gene conversion rate, cross-over recombination rate is 0.
It requires a parameter for the mean recombination track length.

  • [] genetic map of recombination rates (as a hapmap or csv file) : NA
  • [] genome-wide mean recombination rate (which will be used as the default)

Mutation rate:

  • genome-wide mean mutation rate : 1.53x10-9 snp/site/generation
    • in Da Cunha, 2014 paper : mutation rate estimated : 0.56 SNP/Mb/year

Demographic model:

  • [] as a list of population sizes, growth rates, migration rates, etcetera. (optional)
  • [] citation

Other information:

These are things we don't currently use, but will want to use in the future:

  • [] sex determination system, and which chromosomes are the sex chromosome(s)
  • [] ploidy
@jeanrjc jeanrjc added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 8, 2021
@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher added the Species Issues relating to species data in the catalog label Apr 8, 2021
@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

Question : Should I add this clone as if I were adding a species, or should I proceed differently ?

Yes? I don't see what else we'd do.

@jeanrjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

jeanrjc commented Apr 8, 2021

Question : Should I add this clone as if I were adding a species, or should I proceed differently ?

Yes? I don't see what else we'd do.

We discussed this with Jerome and Franz, and we figured that we will do like this indeed.

The issue that may come up at some point, is if people want to add another strain of the same species, especially if that strain is parametrized differently.

@jeromekelleher
Copy link
Member

I think we'll start adding the strain suffix to the species ID then @jeanrjc - but for now, let's not worry about it.

@jeanrjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

jeanrjc commented Apr 8, 2021

yes, it was my follow up question. But I'll stick to StrAga for now.

@jeromekelleher
Copy link
Member

Closed in #854

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Species Issues relating to species data in the catalog
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants