You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've just created a package for a legacy system with Plone 4.3.9 with this package (I'm using plonecli 0.2.0 and bobtemplates.plone 3.3.0.)
Checking the generated buildout.cfg, I've seen that we have at least 40 packages pins. Don't you think this is too much? Since they're said to be # development dependencies (tools and pre commit hook) **, don't** we have a development.cfg effort like http://dist.plone.org/release/4.3-latest/versions.cfg for example? @esteele what do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IMO it overrides too many packages. At least for Plone 5.1 this is not needed. It also adds headache when upgrading to a new Plone version (even if its just a bugfix release). The pins should be checked very carefully and there should be a reason noted as comment or as an plone.versioncheck compatible section entry.
I've just created a package for a legacy system with Plone 4.3.9 with this package (I'm using plonecli 0.2.0 and bobtemplates.plone 3.3.0.)
Checking the generated
buildout.cfg
, I've seen that we have at least 40 packages pins. Don't you think this is too much? Since they're said to be# development dependencies (tools and pre commit hook) **
, don't** we have a development.cfg effort like http://dist.plone.org/release/4.3-latest/versions.cfg for example? @esteele what do you think?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: