Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add a field for a verbatim qualifying clause #112

Open
gaurav opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Add a field for a verbatim qualifying clause #112

gaurav opened this issue Nov 1, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
difficulty: easy Should be easy to do (1-2 days) programming only No discussion necessary; just pure programming needed
Milestone
User interface im...

Comments

@gaurav
Copy link
Member

gaurav commented Nov 1, 2018

We should record a verbatim qualifying clause in a separate field. Eventually, we also need to figure out how to support qualifying clauses in OWL, but this will allow us to identify phyloreferences that have qualifying clauses.
@gaurav gaurav mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2018
Open
@gaurav gaurav added difficulty: easy Should be easy to do (1-2 days) programming only No discussion necessary; just pure programming needed labels Aug 9, 2019
@gaurav gaurav added this to the User interface improvements milestone Nov 15, 2019
@gaurav
Copy link
Member Author

gaurav commented Nov 18, 2021

Qualifying clauses will be included in the verbatim definition in any case, so will be visible to users in Klados. Since we haven't implemented qualifying clauses in the OWL representation, I don't think we need to represent them separately in Klados. Closing.

@gaurav gaurav closed this as completed Nov 18, 2021
@hlapp
Copy link
Member

hlapp commented Nov 19, 2021

You may end up being right with this, but it seems premature to make that conclusion now.

@hlapp hlapp reopened this Nov 19, 2021
@hlapp hlapp mentioned this issue Nov 19, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
difficulty: easy Should be easy to do (1-2 days) programming only No discussion necessary; just pure programming needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
User interface improvements
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gaurav @hlapp