-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update hyper to 0.12 #298
Comments
Thanks for jumping on it, I started the migration some time ago (just pushed |
Yep, I'm already about half way through it. I'll have a look at that branch. Thanks :) |
Is there any particular reason to keep the This may be something you guys have tested already and maybe there is some particular reason you want to stay single threaded. If that's the case I can make sure that all Otherwise I'll proceed with converting it to the standard tokio configuration (using a |
We wanted to have a handle that closes the server when dropped. And to simplify spawning a new server if you don't really care that much for async/tokio stuff. It's fine to convert it to |
So far the only API change I was planning to make is simply renaming You can see the changes on this branch. So far, I've mostly finished changes to the |
Just an update: I haven't had time to work on this since last week and I have some travel coming up soon but I'm pretty much down to the final pieces and I'll do my best to get a PR submitted within in the next few days. |
Is this still in motion? |
PR is here: #303 Integrating similar changes into Parity (to properly test the changes made by #303) is largely blocked by: openethereum/parity-ethereum#9533 A WIP branch for those changes is: https://github.com/poanetwork/parity-ethereum/tree/c0gent-tokio |
I see that this PR has been sitting for a while. I'd like to make the changes necessary to update hyper. I want to remove the rest of
tokio-core
from Parity due to its deprecation (migrate totokio
) and I'll need to update the reactorHandle
to do that.Is there anything in particular I should to be concerned about? Has anyone else looked into this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: