-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bot fmt
#93
Comments
It could be implemented in processbot since we already have Using command-bot has another benefit: we'll use whatever's the latest CI image to format the project, which is guaranteed to be aligned with the CI checks, as opposed to formatting through processbot's toolchain which might become outdated in case the bot isn't restarted after the CI image is updated. We plan for command-bot to become "the general bot command" while processbot remains focused on the merging automation. This request inspired me to create paritytech/parity-processbot#396 which reinforces this idea. For the time being I'll move this ticket to command-bot since it fits better there. |
Totally, I actually opened the issue in a wrong place. This belongs to command-bot. |
Just to make sure I understood your comment, we can't do it already in command-bot, right? |
You "can't do" in the sense that the command is not available at the moment, but it's possible to implement it. The To create that command we'd do the following
|
Test: however the command-bot probably doesn't expect us to not pass arguments Filed: #96 to fix this weird thing |
All of this syntax is very weird. Honestly, I don't care what 1000 bots we got, the syntax should be simple. A simple Can we not just merge bots or make on general thing that reacts to "bot" and then call the appropriate functionality? |
Still find it weird that there is some difference between |
@bkchr sorry what |
Sorry, I meant some common prefix. Aka instead of having a wide variety of different ways to call different bots, some common prefix would be nice. Something like:
Currently the last two for example are completely different command syntaxes. |
yep, that's what command-bot will be essentially. /cmd queue -c bench $ ... the problem is clear though - the syntax :) and there is a remedy for it #97 💊 |
Closing this meanwhile, as technically it's possible to run, improvements to syntax will be followed up in upcoming issues |
should trigger a
cargo +nightly fmt
on the codebase and push back.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: