You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For ease of use and a slightly less verbose implementation, wouldn't it be useful to implement directly within the Header structure methods such as is_some_excess_blob_gas, is_some_parent_beacon_block_root, etc?
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the change
At the moment, there are different places of the codebase where we use the
is_some
method for some fields of the header structure like:reth/crates/primitives/src/header.rs
Line 260 in 27caf7b
or
reth/crates/consensus/common/src/validation.rs
Line 53 in 27caf7b
For ease of use and a slightly less verbose implementation, wouldn't it be useful to implement directly within the
Header
structure methods such asis_some_excess_blob_gas
,is_some_parent_beacon_block_root
, etc?Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: