Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QST: Publish my personal modification of the official pandas cheat sheet #39724

Closed
OliEfr opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #39806
Closed

QST: Publish my personal modification of the official pandas cheat sheet #39724

OliEfr opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #39806

Comments

@OliEfr
Copy link
Contributor

OliEfr commented Feb 10, 2021

Hi all,

I found that the official cheat sheet could be optimized a bit.

I created my personalized version of the pandas cheat sheet and published it on my github here.

Is this alright? I mentioned all sources and inspireations and chose the same license.

If you like the sheet, I can create a PR.

Let my know if I violate any license rights or if you feel uncomfortable with me publishing this.

@OliEfr OliEfr added Needs Triage Issue that has not been reviewed by a pandas team member Usage Question labels Feb 10, 2021
@rhshadrach
Copy link
Member

One of the things I noticed is that yours contains links to the documents, which I think is a great addition. I'm +1 here.

The other changes I see are swapping out sections for new ones, and some minor refactoring of sections that doesn't add/remove content. These seem to be of more questionable value to me in that there are pros and cons.

My recommendation would be to detail the major changes here so that they can be discussed, and put up a PR for (a) links and (b) any edits that correct or clarify the presentation (these are non-controversial).

@rhshadrach rhshadrach added Docs Enhancement and removed Needs Triage Issue that has not been reviewed by a pandas team member Usage Question labels Feb 13, 2021
@OliEfr
Copy link
Contributor Author

OliEfr commented Feb 13, 2021

I actually figured the thing with the links as well - that's why I created a seperate PR for them and this was merger already (so that would be (a)) :)

Yes, the other changes are more controversial. I'll keep validating my changes for myselft for now and will create a PR later :)

@OliEfr OliEfr closed this as completed Feb 13, 2021
@OliEfr OliEfr reopened this Feb 13, 2021
@OliEfr OliEfr mentioned this issue Feb 14, 2021
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants