Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Column name class is ignored when using to_dict(orient="records") after upgrading to 0.24 #25071

Closed
jmsmkn opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
Duplicate Report Duplicate issue or pull request

Comments

@jmsmkn
Copy link

jmsmkn commented Feb 1, 2019

Code Sample, a copy-pastable example if possible

In pandas 0.24 we encounter a bug where the dictionary key is not set correctly if the column name is class and we use to_dict(orient="records"). All other orientations are ok. If we use the column name klass then the records orientation is also ok. Our csv file is:

case, class
1, 1
2, 0
3, 1
4, 0
5, 1
6, 0
7, 1
8, 0

Then, we load the data with:

read_csv(fname, skipinitialspace=True).to_dict(orient="records")

Problem description

All column names should be in the records, class has been replaced with _1 in the new version of pandas.

Expected Output

In pandas 0.23.4 the resulting dictionary is:

df:
   case  class
0     1      1
1     2      0
2     3      1
3     4      0
4     5      1
5     6      0
6     7      1
7     8      0

to_dict:
<class 'list'>: [{'case': 1, 'class': 1}, {'case': 2, 'class': 0}, {'case': 3, 'class': 1}, {'case': 4, 'class': 0}, {'case': 5, 'class': 1}, {'case': 6, 'class': 0}, {'case': 7, 'class': 1}, {'case': 8, 'class': 0}]

This is what we'd expect. However, in pandas 0.24 we get:

df:
   case  class
0     1      1
1     2      0
2     3      1
3     4      0
4     5      1
5     6      0
6     7      1
7     8      0

to_dict:
<class 'list'>: [{'case': 1, '_1': 1}, {'case': 2, '_1': 0}, {'case': 3, '_1': 1}, {'case': 4, '_1': 0}, {'case': 5, '_1': 1}, {'case': 6, '_1': 0}, {'case': 7, '_1': 1}, {'case': 8, '_1': 0}]

Note that the class column name is missing from the keys in the records. This occurs in python 3.6 and 3.7 (https://travis-ci.org/comic/evalutils/builds/486831323)

The column name class is preserved in the dictionary when using all orient="dict", "list", "series", "split" or "index".

If we change the column name to klass, then we do not get this problem using any orientation.

It is not clear to me if this solves the problem: #24965

Output of pd.show_versions()

INSTALLED VERSIONS
------------------
commit: None
python: 3.6.5.final.0
python-bits: 64
OS: Linux
OS-release: 4.15.0-44-generic
machine: x86_64
processor: x86_64
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: en_GB.UTF-8
LOCALE: en_GB.UTF-8

pandas: 0.24.0
pytest: 3.8.0
pip: 18.0
setuptools: 40.2.0
Cython: None
numpy: 1.15.1
scipy: 1.1.0
pyarrow: None
xarray: None
IPython: None
sphinx: 1.8.0
patsy: None
dateutil: 2.7.3
pytz: 2018.5
blosc: None
bottleneck: None
tables: None
numexpr: None
feather: None
matplotlib: None
openpyxl: None
xlrd: None
xlwt: None
xlsxwriter: None
lxml.etree: None
bs4: None
html5lib: None
sqlalchemy: None
pymysql: None
psycopg2: None
jinja2: 2.10
s3fs: None
fastparquet: None
pandas_gbq: None
pandas_datareader: None
gcsfs: None
None
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

It is not clear to me if this solves the problem: #24965

It indeed does. We hope to release the fix with 0.24.1 in a few days!

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added the Duplicate Report Duplicate issue or pull request label Feb 1, 2019
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the No action milestone Feb 1, 2019
@jmsmkn
Copy link
Author

jmsmkn commented Feb 1, 2019

Perfect, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Duplicate Report Duplicate issue or pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants