Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expected failures on EOS storage get out of date #1549

Closed
phil-davis opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

expected failures on EOS storage get out of date #1549

phil-davis opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 8 comments

Comments

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

We did not manage to get the core API tests running in CI with EOS storage. That means that we do not get automated feedback abut which things are passing and failing with EOS storage. So the contents of https://github.com/owncloud/ocis/blob/master/tests/acceptance/expected-failures-API-on-EOS-storage.md get out-of-date.

What should we do about that?

  • try harder to get the tests running in CI with EOS storage
  • get someone to locally run the tests "every so often" and adjust the expected-failures file
  • something else?
@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor Author

phil-davis commented Jan 29, 2021

@dpakach can you add some comments about what was difficult when trying to run EOS in CI.

I added this to the QA/CI/TestAutomation project so that we notice it to discuss. After discussion then we can see what effort is needed...

@butonic
Copy link
Member

butonic commented Jan 29, 2021

There is also work on a Cephfs storage driver. One by @thmour one by @aduffeck Something the keep in mind...

@settings settings bot removed the QA-Team label Jan 29, 2021
@individual-it
Copy link
Member

issues in CI see #586 & owncloud/product#156
but currently we are even failing to run EOS locally or on hetzner servers see #541 (comment)

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 6, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 10 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the Status:Stale label Jun 6, 2021
@refs
Copy link
Member

refs commented Jun 7, 2021

How important is this? Bringing @micbar to the party. It sounds relevant enough to pull it into the backlog.

@stale stale bot removed the Status:Stale label Jun 7, 2021
@micbar
Copy link
Contributor

micbar commented Jun 7, 2021

@refs @phil-davis at the moment, this is not possible.

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor Author

When someone wants to know how well EOS storage is working, we could get another someone to run the core API tests locally against an EOS storage setup. And they could update the expected-failures. It just depends on how often to put in the effort of this.

@butonic
Copy link
Member

butonic commented Jul 1, 2021

eos tests are no longer covered by ocis ci. it should run in reva or elsewhere.

@butonic butonic closed this as completed Jul 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants