Skipped jobs should provide reason #60882
Replies: 2 comments
-
I agree. I'm trying to debug a situation where a job with an if conditional is not running. GitHub output provides no help, even when debugging is enabled. I've added artificial steps and jobs to try to debug the problem and it all works as expected except for the job with the if conditional, which is not running for some reason. Since there's on debugging output for skipped jobs, I'm blocking from making progress. I'll likely have to stop using the if conditional in favor if using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Similar situation here, got a deployment step which is being skipped with no clear explanation why. Step calls a reusable workflow and has a dependency on a dummy step just to pass env vars (another limitation of GH Actions). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
Currently when a job is skipped due to an if conditional the output view just says "This job was skipped" with no further explanation. This can be confusing for users who may be opening PRs but are not familiar with GitHub actions and may be confused why an expected check is not being run.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions