-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPDX][TV] SBOM value format is incorrect for PackageComment #284
Comments
hey @surendrapathak how to download the sbom-spdx-generator? |
It can be downloaded from: https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.2.2/package-information/#7201-description Generated sbom is attached: and reference to the spec is here: https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.2.2/package-information/#7201-description |
I couldnt figure out the file to be downloaded from https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.2.2/package-information/#7201-description or there is no file to be downloaded |
My mistake the actual instructions should be :
|
@surendrapathak We don't check for SBOM quality. In the SPDX 2.2 spec, PackageComment is optional. However, this is a valid bug. If there are no comments then there should be no tag. @prakrit55 Are you interested in fixing this bug? |
Hey @nishakm I will be happy to get it fixed. |
@prakrit55 Cool! At this time, the fastest fix is to not create a |
Summary
SPDX value format is missing or incorrect for
PackageComment
PackageComment: NOASSERTION
Background
SPDX value format is missing or incorrect for
PackageComment
Expected behavior
PackageComment
should be delimited by <text>..</text>Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain the problem.
Repository
Which repository causes this error?
Additional Context
Optional - add any other context about the problem here.
Acceptance Criteria
The "done" criteria when this feature or problem is resolved. Such as:
References
Limited to SPDX.
Finder: sbomqs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: