[PRE REVIEW]: phylogram: an R package for phylogenetic analysis with nested lists

[whedon]

Submitting author: @shaunpwilkinson (Shaun Wilkinson)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/phylogram
Version: v2.1.0
Editor: @karthik
Reviewers: @arfon

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @shaunpwilkinson. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@shaunpwilkinson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @karthik it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof 📄 <--

[shaunpwilkinson]

Hi @karthik and others, thanks for considering this paper for JOSS. As for suggested reviewers, @wcornwell and @benjward have already reviewed the source code for ropensci and are familiar with the workings of the package, so may be a good place to start. Otherwise on the list of JOSS reviewers @juanvillada and @giraola have interests in phylogenetic analysis with R.

[arfon]

@karthik - it looks like this package has been through the rOpenSci on-boarding in ropensci/software-review#212 so I think we're good to fast-tracking this?

[karthik]

@arfon Roger that. Please fast track 🚀

[arfon]

@whedon assign @arfon as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @arfon

[arfon]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #790. Feel free to close this issue now!