[PRE REVIEW]: dwctaxon, an R package for editing and validating taxonomic data in Darwin Core format

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @joelnitta (Joel Nitta)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/dwctaxon
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v2.0.3
Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Reviewers: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e7945e455a68ba0adedd2a6fd23450e0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e7945e455a68ba0adedd2a6fd23450e0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e7945e455a68ba0adedd2a6fd23450e0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e7945e455a68ba0adedd2a6fd23450e0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @joelnitta. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@joelnitta if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (1262.0 files/s, 190104.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               47            343           1119           5910
Markdown                        10            293              0            977
JSON                             1              0              0            359
Rmd                              5            280            437            258
YAML                             4             12             11            173
TeX                              1              3              9             59
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            68            931           1576           7736
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1080/14888386.2003.9712683 is OK
- 10.1007/s10531-013-0472-x is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715 is OK
- 10.3897/phytokeys.25.3100 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1946

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

datawizard: An R Package for Easy Data Preparation and Statistical Transformations
Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @tomfaulkenberry, @garretrc
Similarity score: 0.7963

rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity
Submitting author: @btmonier
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1
Similarity score: 0.7950

SymbiotaR2: An R Package for Accessing Symbiota2 Data
Submitting author: @akoontz11
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @kyleniemeyer
Similarity score: 0.7908

rcites: An R package to access the CITES Speciesplus database
Submitting author: @JonasGeschke
Handling editor: @karthik (Retired)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.7891

tidyfst: Tidy Verbs for Fast Data Manipulation
Submitting author: @hope-data-science
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @tomsing1, @rcannood
Similarity score: 0.7868

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[joelnitta]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @joelnitta, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[joelnitta]

This submission has already passed code review at rOpenSci: ropensci/software-review#574

According to the JOSS docs, I am supposed to assign myself as editor and reviewer. So here goes.

[joelnitta]

@editorialbot add @joelnitta as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry @joelnitta, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.

[joelnitta]

@editorialbot add @joelnitta as editor

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry @joelnitta, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@joelnitta sorry that documentation is for editors 😃 I'll check this submission now and will assign myself etc.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman is now the editor

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot add me as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman added to the reviewers list!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6215.