[PRE REVIEW]: VisWaterNet: A Python package for visualization of water distribution networks

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @meghnathomas (Meghna Thomas)
Repository: https://github.com/tylertrimble/viswaternet
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @crvernon
Reviewers: @erexer, @thurber
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e9876602a7c3fdbfefe4ac8d913d3975"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e9876602a7c3fdbfefe4ac8d913d3975/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e9876602a7c3fdbfefe4ac8d913d3975/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e9876602a7c3fdbfefe4ac8d913d3975)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @meghnathomas. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@meghnathomas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.08 s (687.6 files/s, 100413.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          27            827           1757           3533
reStructuredText                17            265            249            324
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0            557            125
make                             2             25              6             76
YAML                             3             11             15             64
TeX                              1              6              0             61
Markdown                         2             21              0             55
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             27
INI                              1              4              0             15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            55           1167           2585           4280
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 813

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.022 is OK
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-18638-7_6 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000191 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[meghnathomas]

Hi, this is a list of potential reviewers:

Mariosmsk
abhiramm7
amabdallah
glorialulu
kaklise
eladsal
rtaormina

[kthyng]

@meghnathomas Thank you for the list! I'm going to try to find an editor for you next.

[kthyng]

Hi @crvernon! Are you up for editing this?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @crvernon as editor

[editorialbot]

There was a problem inviting the user to edit this submission.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @crvernon as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot assign @crvernon as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor

[crvernon]

👋 @meghnathomas - I'll be your topic editor for this submission.

I'll get you two reviewers set up ASAP and then we can kick off the full review!

[crvernon]

👋 @erexer Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[erexer]

@crvernon happy to!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot assign @erexer as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @erexer as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@erexer added to the reviewers list!

[crvernon]

👋 @thurber Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[thurber]

👋 @thurber Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Yes, I am willing

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @thurber as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@thurber added to the reviewers list!

[crvernon]

👋 - Alright @meghnathomas, @erexer , and @thurber I am going to close this Pre-Review and kick off the full review which you should receive a notification for. Thanks!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5139.