[PRE REVIEW]: pypulseq #1678
Comments
|
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type: What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
|
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, another imaging-related submission—do you have the bandwidth to edit this one? |
|
@whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor |
|
OK, the editor is @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman |
|
Hello @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman , we'd like to suggest spinicist, grlee77, mwegrzyn as reviewers. |
|
Hi @sravan953, I am interested in taking a look. I work in a Philips environment currently, but have also done sequence programming for GE and Siemens scanners in the past, so this is pretty relevant. |
whedon
assigned grlee77 and Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman and unassigned Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
|
OK, the reviewer is @grlee77 |
|
@mwegrzyn are you interested in reviewing this work for JOSS? |
|
Hello, |
|
@kelvinlayton @stefan-k would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)? The review focuses largely on the software and a very short paper. |
|
Thanks for the invitation! Maybe @m-a-x-i-m-z is interested in this too. |
|
@sairamgeethanath one reviewer still pending, am I right @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman ? |
|
@sravan953 yes we are still recruiting reviewers. Aiming for 3 hopefully. |
|
@stefan-k thanks for your message and for clarifying the potential conflict of interest. Since we will have multiple reviewers without a conflict of interest, if you were to join decisions will not rest solely on your judgement/comments. Therefore, since it sounds like you could have valuable feedback, I'd still welcome your contribution as an additional reviewer. Let me know what you decide. |
|
Unfortunately I have to decline as I won't have time. Maybe @jfnielsen or @magland, who have worked on similar software, are interested to help out. |
|
I'm happy to review but like stefan-k I'm collaborating with the authors on related topics which is technically a conflict. I'm certainly interested though. |
|
@whedon add @jfnielsen as reviewer |
|
OK, @jfnielsen is now a reviewer |
|
@jfnielsen thanks for pointing out the conflict of interest. I'll welcome you as an additional reviewer and will also recruit reviewers without a conflict of interest. Thanks for your help. |
|
@spinicist would you be interested in reviewing this work for the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)? The review focuses largely on the software and a very short paper. |
|
@whedon remove @jfnielsen as reviewer |
whedon
assigned grlee77 and Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman and unassigned grlee77, Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman and jfnielsen
|
OK, @jfnielsen is no longer a reviewer |
|
@jfnielsen After consulting with the editorial board it was decided to not include you due to the conflict of interest you referred to. My apologies for the confusion. Thanks again for offering to review for JOSS. I will consider you as a potential reviewer for other MRI related submissions. |
|
@mfroeling @khammernik are you or your co-workers interested in reviewing this work for JOSS (The Journal of Open Source Software) on MRI pulse sequence design in Python? The review focuses largely on the software and a very short paper. |
|
@nstikov, @vsoch, @mathieuboudreau would you be interested in reviewing this JOSS submission? |
|
Sure! |
|
@whedon add @mathieuboudreau as reviewer |
whedon
assigned grlee77, Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman and mathieuboudreau and unassigned grlee77 and Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
|
OK, @mathieuboudreau is now a reviewer |
|
@whedon start review |
|
OK, I've started the review over in #1725. Feel free to close this issue now! |
|
This pre-review issue will now be closed. People interested in helping to review should head over to #1725. |
|
My apologies for missing the review request last week. If you need a 3rd reviewer for some reason let me know. |
|
@spinicist yes we do welcome a 3rd! I'll add you over at #1725. Thanks! |
Submitting author: @imr-framework (Sairam Geethanath)
Repository: https://github.com/imr-framework/pypulseq
Version: 1.2.2
Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Reviewers: @grlee77, @mathieuboudreau
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @imr-framework. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@imr-framework if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: