Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPIKE] Assist UX/UI for KServe/ModelMesh experience #193

Closed
3 tasks
heyselbi opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks

[SPIKE] Assist UX/UI for KServe/ModelMesh experience #193

heyselbi opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@heyselbi
Copy link

heyselbi commented Sep 14, 2023

This is to address the req 17:
17. Support options for KServe and/or ModelMesh (support KServe - 1 model per pod or modelmesh - multiple models per pod)
a. P0: RHODS admins should be able to configure whether they want to use KServe (single model serving + additional functionality), ModelMesh, or both

  • This would be a cluster-level setting
    • Need to clearly communicate the differences between KServe and MM - don’t need to refer to the open source project names, but rather describe the functional differences
  • Default option for new customers would be KServe only
  • If only one option, potential to streamline / simplify the UI
    • ModelMesh - need to configure model server
    • KServe - do we need the model server UI? Would all the options be available in UI for deploying a single model?
  • If admins want to make both options available, users would choose between KServe & MM in a project
  • All existing customers should have no change in functionality upon migration (eg. likely MM only)
  • Changes to cluster setting would be applied on a move forward basis (newly created projects). No changes to existing projects.

Acceptance criteria:

  • Set up a meeting with UX/UI teams to identify the issues that would need to be addressed
  • (optional) If needed, set up follow up meetings to consult and guide the UX/UI teams on req 17
  • Create follow up issues that would require Dev work
@heyselbi heyselbi converted this from a draft issue Sep 14, 2023
@heyselbi heyselbi changed the title [SPIKE] Develop guidance for UX/UI in terms of KServe/ModelMesh [SPIKE] Assist UX/UI for KServe/ModelMesh experience Sep 14, 2023
@heyselbi heyselbi moved this from New/Backlog to To-do/Groomed in ODH Model Serving Planning Sep 14, 2023
@Jooho
Copy link

Jooho commented Oct 3, 2023

@heyselbi heyselbi moved this from To-do/Groomed to In Progress in ODH Model Serving Planning Oct 31, 2023
@heyselbi
Copy link
Author

Closing it as we already have a daily meeting set up with UI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Status: No status
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants