Add Portuguese version of website pages

[chalin]

We'll use this issue to track the added support of a pt (pt-BR) localization. This issue can be modelled after the following issue, without being identical since, for example, we might not be using CODEOWNERS for very long:

• Add Japanese version of website pages #4592

I'll let other @open-telemetry/docs-maintainers or approvers populate this issue. I just wanted it created so that we have something to reference. A preliminary list of tasks is provided below.

Tasks

• Create homepage - [pt-br] Localize index page to Portuguese (Brazil)  #4794
• Create org-level groups for pt maintainers and approvers.
  • @edsoncelio - you'll want to identify / list maintainers and approvers
  • Cf. New teams docs-pt-approvers and docs-pt-maintainers community#2232
• Create an issue label for lang:pt
• Update CODEOWNERS or the equivalent
• Other content:
  • [pt-br] feat: add translation of index docs #4868
  • For more entries, see [pt] Portuguese page localization #4922

[edsoncelio]

Hi @chalin!

A few questions related to the next steps after the index page localization.

• Regarding the maintainers, all need to be part of the open telemetry org, right? A few folks want to be part of it, but in a positive answer, we will need to work on it separately.
• Following the Japanese setup, my suggestion is to start with the localization for the pages "What's OpenTelemetry" and "Getting Started." Does this need to be done only after the maintainers are set up, or can we already start to work on it?

Thanks!

[svrnm]

hey @edsoncelio,

I will raise the issue to get the groups created, to bootstrap the group we will add people initially who are members of the org already. For those who are not members of the org, they can still review and we will count them in the early days and merge when they did so, after a while we can add them to the org (and teams) as well.

You can go ahead and create localizations independently of that group existing, those 2 things can be managed async.

Thanks

[chalin]

@theletterf @svrnm - I think that this can be closed, right?

[theletterf]

Fine by me!