Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add reform file for TCJA_House_Amended #1664

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2017

Conversation

MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

@MattHJensen MattHJensen commented Nov 14, 2017

This reform file is for the TCJA House bill with amendments as of 11-9-17.

The two amendments are described at:

https://waysandmeansforms.house.gov/uploadedfiles/summary_of_chairman_amendment.pdf
https://waysandmeansforms.house.gov/uploadedfiles/summary_of_chairman_amendment_2.pdf

The only provision that I have identified for us to model is the following.

Section 1004 – Maximum rate on business income of individuals (reduced rate for small businesses with net active business income) The amendment provides a 9-percent tax rate, in lieu of the ordinary 12-percent tax rate, for the first $75,000 in net business taxable income of an active owner or shareholder earning less than $150,000 in taxable income through a pass-through business. As taxable income exceeds $150,000, the benefit of the 9-percent rate relative to the 12-percent rate is reduced, and it is fully phased out at $225,000. Businesses of all types are eligible for the preferential 9-percent rate, and such rate applies to all business income up to the $75,000 level. The 9-percent rate is phased in over five taxable years, such that the rate for 2018 and 2019 is 11 percent, the rate for 2020 and 2021 is 10 percent, and the rate for 2022 and thereafter is 9 percent. For unmarried individuals, the $75,000 and $150,000 amounts are $37,500 and $75,000, and for heads of household, those amounts are $56,250 and $112,500.

I made a fairly substantial simplification while modeling this provision. In this reform file, the benefit of the reduced 9% rate is clawed back from pass through income through the bubble rates. As the bill is written, it should also be clawed back from non-pass-through taxable income if non-pass-through taxable income exceeds pass-through income and there is insufficient pass-through income for a full clawback.

@codykallen, could you please review?

@martinholmer @GoFroggyRun @evtedeschi3

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 14, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1664 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1664   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files          37      37           
  Lines        2856    2856           
======================================
  Hits         2856    2856

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e245b7d...6973b25. Read the comment docs.

@codykallen
Copy link
Contributor

@MattHJensen, why did the beginning of the 25% bracket change? Did the amendment change that? Can you explain how the bracket changed, ignoring how the 11/10/9 percent rates are implemented and phased out, and then how the brackets change based on these preferential brackets?

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MattHJensen, why did the beginning of the 25% bracket change? Did the amendment change that? Can you explain how the bracket changed, ignoring how the 11/10/9 percent rates are implemented and phased out, and then how the brackets change based on these preferential brackets?

Looks like I made a mistake. There should be some 25% beneath the bubble rate.

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@codykallen, I added back the 25% beneath the bubble rate in the latest commit.

@codykallen
Copy link
Contributor

@MattHJensen, this looks fine to me.

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @codykallen. Merging.

@MattHJensen MattHJensen merged commit d9a5439 into PSLmodels:master Nov 16, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants