Cherry pick of #1240: Do not allow status objects from other pods to trigger constraint reconciles

[sozercan]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Cherry pick of #1240 for v3.4.1

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, using fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when the PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1371 (45e13e2) into release-3.4 (96e8f1f) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-3.4    #1371      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        49.96%   49.98%   +0.02%     
===============================================
  Files               64       64              
  Lines             4517     4523       +6     
===============================================
+ Hits              2257     2261       +4     
- Misses            1950     1951       +1     
- Partials           310      311       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	49.98% <66.66%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/controller/constraint/constraint_controller.go	4.22% <0.00%> (ø)
...platestatus/constrainttemplatestatus_controller.go	69.62% <71.42%> (-0.25%)	⬇️
...onstrainttemplate/constrainttemplate_controller.go	56.63% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 96e8f1f...45e13e2. Read the comment docs.