Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: set ResolveObject reason #375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2023

Conversation

skyerus
Copy link
Contributor

@skyerus skyerus commented Feb 6, 2023

This PR

  • Reinstate setting of ResolveObject's reason

Discovered as integration tests PR started failing. In future this kind of thing will be picked up as a pipeline failure (all the more reason to get to the bottom of the snyk security issue).

Related Issues

Notes

Follow-up Tasks

How to test

Signed-off-by: Skye Gill <gill.skye95@gmail.com>
@toddbaert
Copy link
Member

I think another reason this happened is there's some duplicated code here. If there's any way to "genericize" these functions, we should do it. If not, we still might be able to extract SOME repeated code into functions.

@skyerus skyerus merged commit dcf199d into open-feature:main Feb 6, 2023
@skyerus skyerus deleted the fix/object-reason branch February 6, 2023 14:19
toddbaert pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.3.6](v0.3.5...v0.3.6)
(2023-02-06)


### Bug Fixes

* set ResolveObject reason
([#375](#375))
([dcf199d](dcf199d))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants