Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add diff option to force output of axioms with labels #361

Closed
dosumis opened this issue Sep 18, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Add diff option to force output of axioms with labels #361

dosumis opened this issue Sep 18, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dosumis
Copy link

dosumis commented Sep 18, 2018

Diffs that present logical axioms with IRIs are hard to interpret. Given that ROBOT is an OBO tool and that OBO ontologies lack readable short_forms, diff output would be much interpret it presented axioms rendered using labels. IIRC, the OWLAPI Manchester Syntax renderer can already produce MS axioms with labels. Not sure if there is a Functional Syntax alternative.

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Member

jamesaoverton commented Sep 18, 2018

Yes, there should be an option for labels.

The history of labels in diffs is a bit confusing, unfortunately. See #47, #349.

@beckyjackson
Copy link
Contributor

I came up with a couple of options for the format... which do you think would work best?

  1. - SubClassOf(<GO:0051674>[localization of cell] <GO:0051179>[localization])
  2. - SubClassOf([localization of cell]<GO:0051674> [localization]<GO:0051179>)
  3. - SubClassOf('localization of cell'[GO:0051674] localization[GO:0051179])
  4. - SubClassOf('localization of cell'<GO:0051674> localization<GO:0051179>)

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Member

I think we used (1) before it mysteriously broke.

@dosumis
Copy link
Author

dosumis commented Sep 18, 2018

Should avoid single quote as some labels have them. Happy with the other two.

@beckyjackson
Copy link
Contributor

Closed by #363 - please reopen if this needs more discussion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants