You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It works, but what I don't like is that there is too much messing around (and too little magic) and apparently not scalable (what if I want to add one more model). Can pixiedust add support of this (or is there a better way that I am not aware of)?
BTW, thanks for the great work creating the package!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current devel branch includes a gaze function. It doesn't actually apply dust, but it does format into the stargazer like format. I haven't worked out significance stars yet, but it has been on my mind.
In academic papers, it is common to show estimation outputs from similar models side-by-side to facilitate comparison.
stargazer
supports this:which produces:
With pixieddust, what I came up is something like this:
It works, but what I don't like is that there is too much messing around (and too little magic) and apparently not scalable (what if I want to add one more model). Can pixiedust add support of this (or is there a better way that I am not aware of)?
BTW, thanks for the great work creating the package!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: