Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bunsen-hydrogen (BunsenLabs) unsupported. #241

Closed
Xulai opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

bunsen-hydrogen (BunsenLabs) unsupported. #241

Xulai opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@Xulai
Copy link

Xulai commented Mar 2, 2016

Making an issue to hope it's considered to be supported.

## Your distribution, identified as "bunsen-hydrogen", is not currently supported, please contact NodeSource at https://github.com/nodesource/distributions/issues if you think this is incorrect or would like your distribution to be considered for support

https://www.bunsenlabs.org/ Is the link for the distro, it's been pretty much appointed to be Crunchbang's successor, basically being Debian + Openbox, Tint2 and Conky.

@carvilsi
Copy link
Contributor

carvilsi commented Mar 5, 2016

Hi.

I have the same issue here with bunsen-hydrogen.

Linux hydrogen 3.16.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u3 (2016-01-17) i686 GNU/Linux

Thanks.

@chrislea
Copy link
Contributor

chrislea commented Mar 5, 2016

Thanks for the interest. Nobody here has a bunsen install to test against, but if it's based on Debian Jessie it should be easy to support. Please just submit a PR against the setup scripts and if it looks good we'll merge it. To see what's been done for other distros that we have aliased support for (Linux Mint for example) look in the sections with the check_alt function being used. Thanks!

@carvilsi
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @chrislea and @rvagg

PR to try add support for bunsenlabs Linux Hydrogen, based on Debian Jessie. This distro is the community continuation of great CrunchBang Linux !#

I Hope this PR is correct, and it's trying to solve this issue and #248 too.

If any change is needed, please tell me.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants