-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Collaborator Summit 2019 - Berlin Edition - 30th and 31st of May #135
Comments
Hi @mcollina, I attended Vancouver 2018 Collab Summit and had a great time. |
One bit of feedback I heard yesterday was that saving all the lightening talks to the end of day 2 so we're prioritizing the working sessions. |
I also would like to help with organizing. |
I would like to help to organize as well :) |
I would love to help with this and attend! |
Overall, ensuring that the event run smoothly. These includes:
|
I would love to help out in any way I can. |
Noted! We are waiting to have budget conversations and talk 2019(the
Budget/Finance subcommittee was not able to meet during Interactive), but
we'll make sure to mention this as part of conversations re: to community
support/events budgets.
…On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:41 AM Ujjwal Sharma ***@***.***> wrote:
I would love to help out in any way I can.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#135 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB46oMWmQabayF-xk_5iYMfWCyTA9oTsks5ulfAVgaJpZM4XbYbP>
.
|
I would love to attend and make myself useful in any way I can! ❤️ |
+1 to limiting the "talks" to the end and making them short (~ the length we had for lightning talks this time). I think its best if most of the time should be for discussions for the WGs/teams or other specific topics. |
I'd also be OK with leaving a very large chunk of the agenda open until the day of, and then bash the agenda for 20 minutes at the start, unconference style. (I'm also OK if the organizers don't want to do it that way. Just a suggestion.) |
Considering my experience of the last two, my impression is that we need the core of the work already done. On Sunday moving 3 slots took me a couple of hours of work to make (almost) everybody happy. |
✋ for all kind of help in organizing next in Berlin. |
If moving three slots took hours, that may be a reason to not overly lock
the agenda in advance. Having more flexibility on the day can allow us to
lock in the agenda based on who is there
…On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 7:30 PM Waleed Ashraf ***@***.*** wrote:
✋ for all kind of help in organizing next in Berlin.
I think we should be clear how much time a session would take. For
example, Governance went for the whole day (and a half) and that wasn't
still enough.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#135 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV5lTlHOMYkI-nGmEFaewEX38nxWeks5ulmwvgaJpZM4XbYbP>
.
|
I would note that without a predetermined draft + the survey that Joyee set
up we would not be able to be as productive.
The overall feedback from Vancouver 2017 and Berlin 2018 has been that more
structure is needed. I think that Vancouver 2018 was a good balance.
If we swift towards a more unconference style, it’s likely that meeting
agendas and presentations will not be prepared.
One problem that I note is that we lacked several members in a lot of
discussions (modules for example). We should be checking in advance if
members will be there when proposing/scheduling a session. Maybe we should
upvote them in advance?
Il giorno mer 17 ott 2018 alle 16:31 Myles Borins <notifications@github.com>
ha scritto:
… If moving three slots took hours, that may be a reason to not overly lock
the agenda in advance. Having more flexibility on the day can allow us to
lock in the agenda based on who is there
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 7:30 PM Waleed Ashraf ***@***.***
wrote:
> ✋ for all kind of help in organizing next in Berlin.
> I think we should be clear how much time a session would take. For
> example, Governance went for the whole day (and a half) and that wasn't
> still enough.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#135 (comment)>,
or mute
> the thread
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV5lTlHOMYkI-nGmEFaewEX38nxWeks5ulmwvgaJpZM4XbYbP
>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#135 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADL4w-uGozcZVG_e_LG3S331vsG3Q2Aks5ulz84gaJpZM4XbYbP>
.
|
For Berlin, we will likely have the advantage of two full days for the summit whereas in Vancouver, because of the code and learn we had only 1.5 days. The additional time and a time boxed agenda set in advance will be helpful, for sure. We should try avoiding overlap in sessions except where we know for certain the participants are ok with it |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
One piece of feedback I've received is that there's a sense that decisions get made at the summits and that excludes people who can't attend these things. Travel fund helps, but aside from the expense, traveling to these things is not easy for some people. I don't know what the solution to that would be, if any, but it's at least something to be aware of. |
(One solution would be to make it easy to stream all the sessions. Even better if people can participate remotely. But that can be a lot of organizational overhead. Would be awesome if we could do it, though.) |
@Trott Some of those could not be easily streamed, e.g. I believe that governance meeting format didn't allow to stream it - i.e. it was split to several smaller discussion groups for some time, and it used a real-world stickerboard. But e.g. the format of the security wg meeting allowed streaming it (it was more like a regular conference discussion with everyone participating), and outside input could have been incorporated e.g. from a chat or something like that. For that format, just streaming + chat could have helped. Or streaming + a GitHub issue for discussion from outside participants - that should reduce the organizational overhead and reduce the barrier ever more. Something similar to what is done with Zoom meetings + questions from IRC. |
Note that enabling remote participation implies having a ~stable agenda some time in advance. |
We have got $30K approved by Board to rent a venue. @trivikr @thefourtheye @mmarchini @sagirk @WaleedAshraf Are you still ok in helping organizing? Also @joyeecheung @jorydotcom @hackygolucky, would you like to help? |
@mcollina Yes, ✋ |
Yes, still interested :D |
Yes :) |
Yup! |
@mcollina happy to drive participation/engagement/planning from the jsf side of the table! |
@mcollina A little late to the party, but yes, I would love to help. |
@ladyleet @jorydotcom @WaleedAshraf do you think we could provide some good ambient mic with Foundation budget? In this way we could at least provide a good audio to the remote participants? |
Not sure how much budget we have but we can get a good quilty table/meeting microphone in 50-60€. And as I have experienced, table microphone does improve audio quality as compared to normal laptop microphone. |
Very helpful discussion here about improving accessibility and remote participation. Spinning out the microphone discussion into its own issue. |
We are def looking for more volunteers to help on an ongoing basis! We have a weekly meeting that you can attend! |
@ladyleet When is the next meeting? I can help with that :] |
@LaRuaNa if you send me your email address i will add you to the cal invite! ladyleet@nodejs.org |
Ping @ladyleet :] Did you receive my email? |
i don't think i did! what is the email so i can look for it? also, thanks to some new folks who joined the planning meeting this week! 🎉 |
@ladyleet then doing it just here :] |
@LaRuaNa thank you! just sent |
I'll try to make it to the summit despite some other things happening on those days :) Let me know if there is anything I can do to help. |
Is the date fixed? (Curious because the 30th is a national holiday in Germany.) |
What sort of impact can we expect from the 30th being a national holiday? |
Same thing last year. I don't think this changes anything, unfortunately. |
I am not sure, hopefully not much, but many businesses are closed. You can certainly expect many drunk people in public. Do we already have a venue?
The same holiday was on May 10th last year. I don't think there was a holiday during last year's summit :) |
Courtyard Berlin City Centre is ready to go. |
I was thinking of Fronleichnam, which is a public holiday in Bavaria :P |
Just FYI - registration and venue information in issue #152 |
The Vancouver 2018 Collab Summit is just finished, and it's time we start planning for next year first event.
Who is up for helping with the organization?
I would like to propose we do it again in Berlin before JSConf.eu on the 30th and 31st of May. I would kindly ask @MylesBorins and @hackygolucky to ask the Board if they could fund a venue for the 2-day event.
cc @nodejs/tsc @nodejs/community-committee @ladyleet
Registration: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openjs-collaborator-summit-tickets-55985971548
CFP: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScneYhY4iqm8x2C2AO9EEzJ5smkOKhLqfxEMQcfNvP5rvXfHg/viewform
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: