We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@redyetidev The experimental coverage thresholds came out super nice.
What do you think about this?
node --test-coverage=90
... which applies equal threshold 90 to line, branch, function or is that too much fluff?
90
The idea is to avoid long scripts node --and-this --and-that ...x
node --and-this --and-that ...x
n/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IIRC we discussed that, but ultimately decided to wait until coverage thresholds have matured a bit before aliasing them.
I'm +1 on it, but IMO it should wait a bit, to see how coverage thresholds grow, and be done before marking coverage as stable.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
@redyetidev The experimental coverage thresholds came out super nice.
What do you think about this?
node --test-coverage=90
... which applies equal threshold
90
to line, branch, function or is that too much fluff?The idea is to avoid long scripts
node --and-this --and-that ...x
Minimal Reproduction
n/a
Output
n/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: