We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not_Assigned
I’ve submitted this through http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html, but track it here since it affects this repository.
Both http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/#Categories as the latest draft of that document i.e. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/proposed.html#Categories list the following example:
\p{General_Category = Not_Assigned}
However, Not_Assigned is not a valid General_Category name as per the table here: http://unicode.org/reports/tr44/#GC_Values_Table
General_Category
Suggested fix: use Unassigned instead in the example.
Unassigned
\p{General_Category = Unassigned}
It would be easy enough to add a Not_Assigned alias but I’d rather not if this is indeed a mistake.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I’ve submitted this through http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html, but track it here since it affects this repository.
Both http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/#Categories as the latest draft of that document i.e. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/proposed.html#Categories list the following example:
However,
Not_Assigned
is not a validGeneral_Category
name as per the table here: http://unicode.org/reports/tr44/#GC_Values_TableSuggested fix: use
Unassigned
instead in the example.It would be easy enough to add a
Not_Assigned
alias but I’d rather not if this is indeed a mistake.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: