Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Switch to formula-based model definition #429

Open
grst opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Switch to formula-based model definition #429

grst opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@nschcolnicov
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@grst
Copy link
Member

grst commented Jan 30, 2025

Description of feature

Just switch to formula-based model defintion. Don't support any more complex models (yet).

I.e. instead of

contrasts:
  - id: condition_control_treated_blockrep
    comparison: ["condition", "control", "treated"]
    blocking_factors: ["replicate"]

use

contrasts:
  -  id: condition_control_treated_blockrep
     formula: ~ condition + replicate
     comparison: ["condition", "control", "treated"]

Sub issue of #362
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
differentialabundance
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@grst @nschcolnicov