You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It'd be great to have jq available in our environments. For me it's use is severely limited by its inability to parse large trees. As a tool specifically for "testing experience" this might not matter, but if we are to start including it in our environments I think it'd be the right time to fix that bug (by contibuting a patch to expose parsing depth as an argument, or maintaining a conda recipe with an incresed depth, or some other way).
Do you mean in our Nextstrain runtimes or dev environments? It's already available in the managed runtimes (docker, conda).
For the Augur dev environment, I don't see inability to parse large trees as a blocker. I think there are few (if any) tests with trees large enough to break jq, and for those cases, whatever's being used right now can stay as-is.
Context
Prompted by #1384 (comment)
Improve testing experience by using
jq
to parse JSON files in functional tests, e.g.augur/tests/functional/refine/cram/year-bounds.t
Lines 41 to 44 in d2ef346
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: