Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: incorrect saving of object representation terms #434

Merged

Conversation

lem-onade
Copy link
Collaborator

@lem-onade lem-onade commented Aug 20, 2021

Implemented as suggested in the issue, but with named nodes instead of blank nodes

@lem-onade lem-onade self-assigned this Aug 23, 2021
@lem-onade lem-onade linked an issue Aug 23, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@lem-onade lem-onade changed the title fix/incorrect-saving-of-object-representation-terms fix: incorrect saving of object representation terms Aug 23, 2021
@lem-onade lem-onade marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2021 08:44
@arnevandoorslaer arnevandoorslaer self-requested a review August 23, 2021 10:12
… github.com:netwerk-digitaal-erfgoed/solid-cbs into fix/incorrect-saving-of-object-representation-terms
@lem-onade lem-onade merged commit 2472265 into develop Aug 23, 2021
@lem-onade lem-onade deleted the fix/incorrect-saving-of-object-representation-terms branch August 23, 2021 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Storage of 'Voorstelling' terms in RDF
2 participants