We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently the deploy preview makes no sense once #83 is merged. The new template supports selecting:
The Remix CLI and remix.init script we have rely on inquirer.js. To be able to generate the templates in CI, we'd need to mock inquirer.js.
Once we are able to generate the apps for all the scenarios above, we could run a local version in the GH action that we could used for E2E tests.
So pre-steps instead of waiting for a deploy preview would be:
ntl build --offline
ntl serve
Having this in place would have prevented #90.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would also be good to add an image that validates that exluded_patterns: ["_assets/*"] doesn't break. Note, it currently works well.
exluded_patterns: ["_assets/*"]
Sorry, something went wrong.
These should generate sites nightly as things move fast. See #110.
No branches or pull requests
Currently the deploy preview makes no sense once #83 is merged. The new template supports selecting:
The Remix CLI and remix.init script we have rely on inquirer.js. To be able to generate the templates in CI, we'd need to mock inquirer.js.
Once we are able to generate the apps for all the scenarios above, we could run a local version in the GH action that we could used for E2E tests.
So pre-steps instead of waiting for a deploy preview would be:
ntl build --offline
.ntl serve
Having this in place would have prevented #90.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: