Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Confirm no recursive locking and transition to fast mutex use #1105

Open
skliper opened this issue Jan 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Confirm no recursive locking and transition to fast mutex use #1105

skliper opened this issue Jan 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@skliper
Copy link
Contributor

skliper commented Jan 19, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently using recursive mutexes due to historical double locks (see #948). Could use more efficient fast mutexes after confirming all recursive locks have been removed.

Describe the solution you'd like
Survey for recursive locks, remove any remaining, and transition to fast mutexes.

Describe alternatives you've considered
None

Additional context
#948 was solved by #1092

Requester Info
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC
@skliper
Copy link
Contributor Author

skliper commented Mar 10, 2021

Touched on in OSAL code review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@skliper