We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi @mscheltienne thank you for this gem*.
I am wondering, since PyDocstyle has been publicly archived, if this template should instead use ruff.lint.pydocstyle (which is what the PyDocstyle devs recommend)?
I've already configured one of my repositories built on this template to do just that. So if you are open to it, I can submit a quick PR.
*If this package is meant for your personal use-cases and not for general consumption, then feel free to close this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feel free to open a PR! I'd love to get rid of some. tooling in favor of ruff!
Sorry, something went wrong.
incoming!
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Hi @mscheltienne thank you for this gem*.
I am wondering, since PyDocstyle has been publicly archived, if this template should instead use ruff.lint.pydocstyle (which is what the PyDocstyle devs recommend)?
I've already configured one of my repositories built on this template to do just that. So if you are open to it, I can submit a quick PR.
*If this package is meant for your personal use-cases and not for general consumption, then feel free to close this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: