Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Looking for Physics Recording Function #24559

Closed
xzhuah opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Looking for Physics Recording Function #24559

xzhuah opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@xzhuah
Copy link

xzhuah commented Aug 30, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I'm always frustrated when MMD does not provide Physics recording function. MikuMikuMoving has that function but
it is noting using the same physics engine as MMD (at least the setting is different), thus we couldn't get the exactly same physics motions. The RGBA physics: https://rgba.blog.jp/archives/10475373.html is an example.

I think with three.js, physics recording could be made possible.

Describe the solution you'd like

I roughly read the code in MMDPhysics.js. I think it is possible to collect all the caculated physics bone's position and agle information at each frame, and write a vmd file at the end to record all motion information of those physics bones. With this file, we essentially recorded all physics calculation and can use it in other program, like blender. Caching these information might be able to save some calculation effort also.

Describe alternatives you've considered

N/A

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Basically I am looking for the Physics record function in MikuMikuMoving, but based on MMD physics engine (the bullet engine)
image

That would be very helpful for MMD makers who currently have to use MMDBridge to bake an alembic file in order to record all the physics effects.

@Mugen87
Copy link
Collaborator

Mugen87 commented Aug 30, 2022

@takahirox What do you think about this?

@takahirox
Copy link
Collaborator

Unfortunately I don't have a plan to make MMDPhysics more rich. But if someone makes a PR and the change is simple, I'm willing to accept it.

@Mugen87
Copy link
Collaborator

Mugen87 commented Oct 22, 2024

This feature is now out of scope, see #29698.

@Mugen87 Mugen87 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 22, 2024
@Mugen87 Mugen87 added this to the r170 milestone Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants