diff --git a/pallets/parachain-staking/src/lib.rs b/pallets/parachain-staking/src/lib.rs
index ce3956364a..da40501ce6 100644
--- a/pallets/parachain-staking/src/lib.rs
+++ b/pallets/parachain-staking/src/lib.rs
@@ -1716,22 +1716,49 @@ pub mod pallet {
 		}
 
 		/// Compute the top `TotalSelected` candidates in the CandidatePool and return
-		/// a vec of their AccountIds (in the order of selection)
+		/// a vec of their AccountIds (sorted by AccountId)
 		pub fn compute_top_candidates() -> Vec<T::AccountId> {
-			let mut candidates = <CandidatePool<T>>::get().0;
-			// order candidates by stake (least to greatest so requires `rev()`)
-			candidates.sort_by(|a, b| a.amount.cmp(&b.amount));
 			let top_n = <TotalSelected<T>>::get() as usize;
-			// choose the top TotalSelected qualified candidates, ordered by stake
-			let mut collators = candidates
-				.into_iter()
-				.rev()
-				.take(top_n)
-				.filter(|x| x.amount >= T::MinCollatorStk::get())
-				.map(|x| x.owner)
-				.collect::<Vec<T::AccountId>>();
-			collators.sort();
-			collators
+			if top_n == 0 {
+				return vec![];
+			}
+
+			let mut candidates = <CandidatePool<T>>::get().0;
+
+			// If the number of candidates is greater than top_n, select the candidates with higher
+			// amount. Otherwise, return all the candidates.
+			if candidates.len() > top_n {
+				// Partially sort candidates such that element at index `top_n - 1` is sorted, and
+				// all the elements in the range 0..top_n are the top n elements.
+				candidates.select_nth_unstable_by(top_n - 1, |a, b| {
+					// Order by amount, then owner. The owner is needed to ensure a stable order
+					// when two accounts have the same amount.
+					a.amount
+						.cmp(&b.amount)
+						.then_with(|| a.owner.cmp(&b.owner))
+						.reverse()
+				});
+
+				let mut collators = candidates
+					.into_iter()
+					.take(top_n)
+					.filter(|x| x.amount >= T::MinCollatorStk::get())
+					.map(|x| x.owner)
+					.collect::<Vec<T::AccountId>>();
+
+				// Sort collators by AccountId
+				collators.sort();
+
+				collators
+			} else {
+				// Return all candidates
+				// The candidates are already sorted by AccountId, so no need to sort again
+				candidates
+					.into_iter()
+					.filter(|x| x.amount >= T::MinCollatorStk::get())
+					.map(|x| x.owner)
+					.collect::<Vec<T::AccountId>>()
+			}
 		}
 		/// Best as in most cumulatively supported in terms of stake
 		/// Returns [collator_count, delegation_count, total staked]
diff --git a/pallets/parachain-staking/src/tests.rs b/pallets/parachain-staking/src/tests.rs
index cbe69e0fba..62d21d6078 100644
--- a/pallets/parachain-staking/src/tests.rs
+++ b/pallets/parachain-staking/src/tests.rs
@@ -9023,3 +9023,21 @@ fn test_on_initialize_weights() {
 			assert_eq!(expected_on_init, expected_weight); // magic number == independent accounting
 		});
 }
+
+#[test]
+fn test_compute_top_candidates_is_stable() {
+	ExtBuilder::default()
+		.with_balances(vec![(1, 30), (2, 30), (3, 30), (4, 30), (5, 30), (6, 30)])
+		.with_candidates(vec![(1, 30), (2, 30), (3, 30), (4, 30), (5, 30), (6, 30)])
+		.build()
+		.execute_with(|| {
+			// There are 6 candidates with equal amount, but only 5 can be selected
+			assert_eq!(ParachainStaking::candidate_pool().0.len(), 6);
+			assert_eq!(ParachainStaking::total_selected(), 5);
+			// Returns the 5 candidates with greater AccountId, because they are iterated in reverse
+			assert_eq!(
+				ParachainStaking::compute_top_candidates(),
+				vec![2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
+			);
+		});
+}