Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(NODE-3695)!: remove lastop and optime from bulk result #3504

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 3, 2023

Conversation

durran
Copy link
Member

@durran durran commented Dec 27, 2022

Description

Removes lastOp() and opTime from bulk results.

What is changing?

  • Removes opTime from bulk result.
  • Removes lastOp() from bulk result.
  • Removes functionality and tests around these when merging bulk results.
Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

None

What is the motivation for this change?

NODE-3695

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@durran durran changed the title feat(NODE-3695): remove lastop and optime from bulk result feat(NODE-3695)!: remove lastop and optime from bulk result Dec 27, 2022
@baileympearson baileympearson self-requested a review January 3, 2023 18:07
@baileympearson baileympearson added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Jan 3, 2023
baileympearson
baileympearson previously approved these changes Jan 3, 2023
@@ -1,132 +0,0 @@
/* eslint-disable no-loss-of-precision */
/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-loss-of-precision */
// TODO(NODE-3774): Lower the integer literals below JS max precision
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we safely close the linked TODO? I think so 🙂

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree - closed that ticket now.

nbbeeken
nbbeeken previously approved these changes Jan 3, 2023
@baileympearson baileympearson dismissed stale reviews from nbbeeken and themself via 811a9e1 January 3, 2023 18:46
@baileympearson baileympearson merged commit 8900d40 into main Jan 3, 2023
@baileympearson baileympearson deleted the NODE-3695 branch January 3, 2023 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants