Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): lodash-es [security] #240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2019

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 10, 2019

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
lodash-es (source) dependencies patch 4.17.11 -> 4.17.14

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2019-10744

Affected versions of lodash are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution.
The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload.


Release Notes

lodash/lodash

v4.17.14

Compare Source


Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: "" in timezone America/Los_Angeles.

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@mike-north mike-north merged commit 213fdb4 into master Jul 10, 2019
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/npm-lodash-es-vulnerability branch July 10, 2019 21:26
mike-north-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2019
## [4.19.5](v4.19.4...v4.19.5) (2019-07-10)

### Bug Fixes

* **deps:** lodash-es [security] ([c469f4d](c469f4d))
* **deps:** lodash-es [security] ([#240](#240)) ([213fdb4](213fdb4))
@mike-north-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.19.5 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants