-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remote Explorer: when there is only one view, split view should not be present #86037
Comments
I think this is expected ad remote viewlet has special behaviour and is not merged. @alexr00 Please confirm? |
That is correct, remote viewlet has special behavior and is not merged since the merging conflicts with the drop down. |
I find that inconsistent - couldn't we merge the actions from the container with the actions of the view? Would there be too much? |
Since the drop-down functions as a filter I think keeping the things it filters (views, including actions) below it it is clearer than having the title change and having actions move to be next to the drop-down. If we merge, it could look like those are top level actions and a top level title, which it is not. I will bring up at the next UX sync to get more input. |
That's makes sense, however since it is for a UX sync, we will probably not tackle it this week. Thus maybe assign to next milestone not this one? |
Moving to February so that it will have more time in insiders for feedback. |
Refs: #85908
This is also happening in Insiders
fyi @sandy081
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: