You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I hope this email finds you well. I am currently working on understanding your work regarding the pre-training procedure for masked audio prediction, and I have encountered a question related to the "All Patch Representations" in the figure of your paper.
Specifically, I am referring to the notation {M} in the "Label Predictor" block. I would appreciate it if you could clarify the following points:
If {M} refers to directly using the masked feature as it is, I am concerned that the dimensions may not align properly.
Alternatively, if I follow the description provided in the paper, should the {M} be all zeros as part of the masking process? I am unsure if my understanding of this aspect is correct, and I would greatly appreciate your confirmation.
Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I hope this email finds you well. I am currently working on understanding your work regarding the pre-training procedure for masked audio prediction, and I have encountered a question related to the "All Patch Representations" in the figure of your paper.
Specifically, I am referring to the notation {M} in the "Label Predictor" block. I would appreciate it if you could clarify the following points:
If {M} refers to directly using the masked feature as it is, I am concerned that the dimensions may not align properly.
Alternatively, if I follow the description provided in the paper, should the {M} be all zeros as part of the masking process? I am unsure if my understanding of this aspect is correct, and I would greatly appreciate your confirmation.
Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: