Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Increase code coverage to 100% #5

Open
ms-mikeb opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #24
Open

Increase code coverage to 100% #5

ms-mikeb opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #24
Assignees
@nilay-kapadia
Labels
status:in-progress Someone is working on implementation type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code

Comments

@ms-mikeb
Copy link
Collaborator

Due to the way our testing is currently done, we did not get the initial release to 100% code coverage.

The goal of this work would be to increase to 100% code coverage.

Some stuff needed to make this happen would be smaller/isolated model sets that would exercise specific aspects of the generation process. i.e. bad models that exercise areas where we throw specific errors. Most of the tests we have right now are happy/normal path scenarios.
@ms-mikeb ms-mikeb added status:ready Ready to start implementation type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code labels Jun 21, 2022
@nilay-kapadia nilay-kapadia self-assigned this Jul 13, 2022
@nilay-kapadia nilay-kapadia added status:in-progress Someone is working on implementation and removed status:ready Ready to start implementation labels Aug 1, 2022
@nilay-kapadia nilay-kapadia linked a pull request Mar 2, 2023 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nilay-kapadia nilay-kapadia

Labels
status:in-progress Someone is working on implementation type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Increase code coverage microsoft/dtdl-model-generator
2 participants
@ms-mikeb @nilay-kapadia