You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
Using a transform, which only acts on a subset of the input columns, before a predictor and not explicitly specifying the features to the predictor will only pass the output columns of the transform to the predictor and not all the input columns.
In the following code, a DataFrame is created with two columns c1 and c2. The c2 column is used as the label and the feature argument is not specified to OGDRegressor. When fit is executed only the output of RangeFilter gets sent as features to OGDRegressor. The c1 column is not included as a feature for the regressor.
Is this the expected behavior or, since the features are not explicitly specified, should all the columns be passed through to the regressor? The latter is the behavior when no transform is put before a predictor.
Using a transform, which only acts on a subset of the input columns, before a predictor and not explicitly specifying the features to the predictor will only pass the output columns of the transform to the predictor and not all the input columns.
In the following code, a DataFrame is created with two columns
c1
andc2
. Thec2
column is used as the label and the feature argument is not specified to OGDRegressor. When fit is executed only the output ofRangeFilter
gets sent as features toOGDRegressor
. Thec1
column is not included as a feature for the regressor.Is this the expected behavior or, since the features are not explicitly specified, should all the columns be passed through to the regressor? The latter is the behavior when no transform is put before a predictor.
Here is the feature combiner node that gets passed to ML.Net,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: