You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The documentation text suggests that the class diagram can show correct UML output — which it can! — but in the examples "attributeName type" is the wrong way round (UML has name then type, not type then name) and omits the colons, so that's confusing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
chrisfcarroll
changed the title
Documentation for classDiagram: "attribute type" order is backwards compared to UML
Documentation for classDiagram examples: "attribute type" order is backwards compared to UML
Jun 14, 2023
The way it works right now is that either method will be accepted. Basically, for backwards compatibility, we display these specific values as typed. As previously we supported type only, attribute name only, etc.
The documentation text suggests that the class diagram can show correct UML output — which it can! — but in the examples "attributeName type" is the wrong way round (UML has name then type, not type then name) and omits the colons, so that's confusing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: